UNITED STATES V. PLANTE 472 F.2d 829 (1st Cir. 1973) CASE BRIEF

UNITED STATES V. PLANTE

472 F.2d 829 (1st Cir. 1973)

NATURE OF THE CASE: These are appeals from convictions for armed bank robbery.

FACTS: Delvental, who stood at the teller's window holding a pistol was identified by virtue of a hidden camera. He pleaded guilty to the robbery, and to a repeat performance at the same bank three weeks later. He was sentenced shortly before the trial to ten years imprisonment for each crime, to be served concurrently. Delvental then testified that while he held up the teller, Plante (D) stood inside the door, holding a shotgun. A teller, confirmed this testimony, and identified D. Iannaco, the mastermind of both robberies, also pleaded guilty, and received twelve years. Iannaco testified for stating that a man named Steve, rather than D, was the other man in the bank. D did not testify but it was brought to the jury's attention that he had been in jail before his present arrest. Delvental volunteered that D had a criminal record. The court, on request, ordered this stricken and instructed the jury to disregard it. Delvental was also asked how long he had known D and answered that D was in jail at the time. D moved for a mistrial, and the court denied it. D also complained that on cross-examination of Iannaco the government brought out that he had been in Lynn, Massachusetts, 'overnight' (which clearly meant in the Lynn jail) with D three weeks before the robbery, and that his first meeting with D had been in a state prison institution eight months prior to that. D was convicted and appealed.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner