If you want a trite 20 second explanation about the law, and most law students do, do not read anything we publish. If you want to learn the law and be an exceptional attorney, welcome aboard.
BEACHCOMBER COINS, INC. V. BOSKETT, 400 A.2d 78 (1979) CASE BRIEF
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
BEACHCOMBER COINS, INC. V. BOSKETT 400 A.2d 78 (1979) CASE BRIEF
BEACHCOMBER COINS, INC. V. BOSKETT
400 A.2d 78 (1979)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an action for rescission. Beachcomber (P) sought to overturn a decision, which held that P could not rescind a contract for the sale of a coin that was entered into with Boskett (D), seller.
FACTS: Beachcomber (P) was a retail coin dealer who purchase a coin from Boskett (D) that was purported to be a 1916 Denver dime. P showed at trial that the coin was a counterfeit and that analysis was not disputed by D. D did dispute that the coin tendered back to him by P was not the one he sold. The trial judge found for D as per trade industry practices that the party purchasing the coin was to assume the risk of genuineness and P had taken 45 minutes to examine the coin and bought it. P then sold it to another for $700 subject to certification of genuineness by the American Numismatic Society. It was labeled counterfeit and P sued D. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND
DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com