IN RE THE WELFARE OF D.F.B.
433 N.W.2d 79 (1988)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Juvenile (D) appealed a decision, which reversed a decision of the
district court that denied a motion by the State (P) to refer the juvenile for prosecution
as an adult.
FACTS: D, age 16, used an ax to kill his parents and a younger brother and younger
sister. Experts agree that D had been depressed for a number of years, that he was
experiencing severe depression at the time he committed the murders, and that his feeling
that he was trapped in a family situation not to his liking somehow led him to the
conclusion that the only remedy was to kill the parents. D killed the younger siblings not
because he was angry with them but to spare them further pain. The issue was whether D is
unamenable to treatment in the juvenile court system consistent with the public safety.
One doctor said no way, and the second said D could be treated successfully in 2-1/2 years,
and probably in considerably less time. Even that doctor acknowledged that many such
depressed people fail in treatment and/or have recurrences after treatment. The district
court concluded that D had produced substantial evidence of amenability to treatment in the
juvenile court system consistent with the public safety. The court denied P's petition to
try D as an adult. The court of appeals held that keeping D in the juvenile court system is
inconsistent with the intent of the legislature expressed in those amendments and it
therefore reversed the district court. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
