SLAYTON V. McDONALD
690 So.2d 914 (1997)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Slayton (P) appealed a judgment, which dismissed P's claim against
McDonald (D) for the personal injuries P's son received when shot by D's son.
FACTS: Fourteen-year-old Daniel (D) and fourteen-year-old Slayton (P) had a disagreement
while riding the school bus to their neighboring homes. P was the larger of the two boys and
was attending high school. D was attending junior high school. P threw a piece of paper at
D. After D threw the paper back P threatened to come to D's house. D testified he had heard
that P had won fights against people larger than himself, and that P could 'take care of
himself pretty good.' P arrived at D's house. After shouting a warning to P, D went into his
house, got his twelve-gauge shotgun, came back outside and loaded the gun with #7 1/2 shot
shells. P still refused to leave. P claimed he did not see D load the gun. D retreated into
his home and called 911 to request help. The front door of the D home did not have a lock
and anyone could open it from the outside. P came inside D's house. The transcript of the
911 conversation confirms that D told P to leave several times, to no avail. D warned P that
if he kept coming, he would be shot. D testified that P frightened him because 'he had a
crazy look in his eye. I didn't know what he was going to do after he didn't stop for the
gun, I thought he must have been crazy.' D counted to three and shot P in the knee. P sued D
claiming $43,310.51 in medical costs and had lost $1,349.00 in wages. The trial court found
P the aggressor and that D acted reasonably. P appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
