Showing posts with label UNITED STATES V. LEWIS 340 U.S. 590 (1951). Show all posts
Showing posts with label UNITED STATES V. LEWIS 340 U.S. 590 (1951). Show all posts

UNITED STATES V. LEWIS 340 U.S. 590 (1951) CASE BRIEF

UNITED STATES V. LEWIS
340 U.S. 590 (1951)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over a refund of an alleged overpayment of taxes.
FACTS: P got a bonus of $22,000 in 1944. P reported this amount on his taxes for 1944. The employer found out that he had made a mistake in computing the bonus due. Judgment was entered for the employer in 1946, and P repaid $11,000. Until the judgment in 1946, P used the money unconditionally as his own in the good faith though mistaken belief that he was entitled to the entire amount. P wanted to recompute his 1944 taxes and get a refund but the government contended that he should merely deduct the $11,000 as a loss on his 1946 return. The Court of Claims held that the excess bonus received under a mistake of fact was not income in 1944 and ordered a refund based on recalculation of the 1944 return; this was based on the Greenwald case. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

ISSUE:


RULE OF LAW:


HOLDING AND DECISION:


LEGAL ANALYSIS:





Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com




© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner

UNITED STATES V. LEWIS 340 U.S. 590 (1951) CASE BRIEF

UNITED STATES V. LEWIS
340 U.S. 590 (1951)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over a refund of an alleged overpayment of taxes.
FACTS: P got a bonus of $22,000 in 1944. P reported this amount on his taxes for 1944. The employer found out that he had made a mistake in computing the bonus due. Judgment was entered for the employer in 1946, and P repaid $11,000. Until the judgment in 1946, P used the money unconditionally as his own in the good faith though mistaken belief that he was entitled to the entire amount. P wanted to recompute his 1944 taxes and get a refund but the government contended that he should merely deduct the $11,000 as a loss on his 1946 return. The Court of Claims held that the excess bonus received under a mistake of fact was not income in 1944 and ordered a refund based on recalculation of the 1944 return; this was based on the Greenwald case. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.

ISSUE:


RULE OF LAW:


HOLDING AND DECISION:


LEGAL ANALYSIS:





Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com




© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner