BAILEY V. PROCTOR
160 F.2d 78 (1st Cir. 1947)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Shareholders (appellants) sought review of the judgment that the
United States district court entered in favor of receivers and others (appellees), ordering
the liquidation of an investment trust and denying the shareholders' initiatives to
resuscitate it.
FACTS: In an earlier case the trustees and officers were found guilty of 'gross abuse of
trust' within the meaning of Section 36 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C.A.
80a-35, and were enjoined from acting or serving in the capacity of trustees or officers. A
receiver was 'appointed with power to reorganize the capital structure of the Trust or
liquidate the Trust and distribute the assets'. Appellants, who were subsequently permitted
to intervene in the receivership proceedings below, now appeal from an order of the district
court (1) denying their prayers for an order directing the calling of a special meeting of
the shareholders of the Trust and the termination of the receivership, (2) disapproving four
plans or reorganization of the Aldred Investment Trust, and (3) directing the receivers to
proceed to liquidate the Trust. Appellants urged that the court lacked jurisdiction to order
liquidation since the Trust was now solvent and rid of the corrupt management which had
necessitated the appointment of receivers, or that, if the court had jurisdiction and power
so to order, it had improperly exercised such power. The appellants likewise protest the
refusal of the court to order a shareholders' meeting and the rejection by the court of the
plans of reorganization without a submittal of them to the security holders.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment