ARKANSAS MIDLAND RAILWAY V. CANMAN
52 Ark. 517 (1890)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a personal injury action.
FACTS: Canman (P) sued Railway (D) for personal injuries sustained by a train derailment.
The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for P and D appealed. The issue was the
inconsistent special findings and the general verdict. The jury basically found negligence
on the part of D but could not agree at to what particular neglect caused the derailment of
the train.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment