DILLY V. S.S. KRESGE, 606 F.2d 62 (4th Cir. 1979) CASE BRIEF

DILLY V. S.S. KRESGE
606 F.2d 62 (4th Cir. 1979)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a personal injury action.
FACTS: Dilly (P) worked at the soda fountain for Kresge (D) when an assistant manager ordered a cup of hot chocolate. P told the manager that she had no hot chocolate left and then the manager grabbed her and shook her and said, 'What the hell do you mean running out of hot chocolate?' The assistant manager said he was joking but P did not think so. P sued because he neck was injured. Both parties filed for summary judgment. Summary judgment was given to P for liability. D filed a motion to set aside the order pursuant to Rule 59. That was denied. P appealed.

ISSUE:


RULE OF LAW:


HOLDING AND DECISION:


LEGAL ANALYSIS:





Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com




© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner

No comments:

Post a Comment