FRIENDS OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS WILDERNESS V. THOMAS 53 F.3d 881 (8th Cir. 1995) CASE BRIEF

FRIENDS OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS WILDERNESS V. THOMAS

53 F.3d 881 (8th Cir. 1995)

NATURE OF THE CASE: Friends (P) appeal from the district court's denial of attorney's fees over the issue of whether the Forst Service’s (D) position in the litigation was substantially justified.

FACTS: Congress passed the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act which unless D determines that there is no feasible nonmotorized means of transporting boats across the portages listed, D shall terminate all such motorized use of each portage listed. D’s plan concluded that the portages shall remain open. P brought an administrative appeal challenging the continued use of the motorized portages as per D. D determined that 'feasible' as used in the Wilderness Area Act meant 'possible, not ideal or most practical.' P filed suit challenging D's decision. The district court held that the Wilderness Area Act was ambiguous and that D's determination was a reasonable interpretation of the Act. P appealed, and the court reversed. It held that the language of the Act was unambiguous, and that D's interpretation was contrary to the proper definition of the term 'feasible.' Following the district court's order requiring D to terminate the operation of motorized portages across the three sets of lakes and remanding the matter to the Secretary of Agriculture to take actions necessary to comply with existing laws, P applied for $72,973.68 in costs and attorney's fees under EAJA. The district court denied the request reasoning that Congress' silence as to what it meant by 'feasible,' made it impossible to conclude that the D's interpretation was not substantially justified, even though a court found it to be erroneous. P’s appealed contending that the district court abused its discretion when it concluded that D's position on the portage issue was substantially justified and that Ps were not entitled to attorney's fees under the EAJA.

ISSUE:

RULE OF LAW:

HOLDING AND DECISION:

LEGAL ANALYSIS:

Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com

© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner