HARKNESS V. HYDE
98 U.S. (8 Otto) 476 (1878)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over service upon an Indian Reservation.
FACTS: A writ of attachment was served upon D, a resident of the Shoshonee reservation,
by the sheriff of Oneida County. D appeared specially by counsel and moved the court to
dismiss the action on the grounds that the service made was outside the bailiwick of the
sheriff and without jurisdiction of the court. The motion was overruled by the Supreme Court
of the Territory and preceded to trial wherein an eventual final verdict of $2,500 was
reached. That judgment was affirmed on appeal and the Supreme Court heard the case.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment