NLRB V. HEARST PUBLICATIONS
322 U.S. 111 (1944)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a refusal of a newspaper to bargain collectively with a
union representing newsboys.
FACTS: Hearst (D) contends they were not obligated to bargain with the newsboys who were
collectively represented by a union in that they were not employees of D but independent
contractors. The NLRB concluded that these boys were employees within the Act and ordered D
to bargain with them. The NLRB ordered D to cease and desist from its refusal. D appealed.
The court of appeals rejected NLRB’s conclusions and made an independent evaluation of
whether the boys were in fact employees. It found they were not employees. The Supreme Court
granted certiorari.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment