SIBBACH V. WILSON & CO.
312 U.S. 1 (1941)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This case questioned the validity of Rules 35 and 37
FACTS: Sibbach (P) brought an action for bodily injury against Wilson (D). P sued in
Illinois District Court for damages suffered in an accident in Indiana. D denied the charges
and asked for a court order for P to submit to a physical examination in accordance with
Rule 35. It was ordered and P refused. D asked for contempt and it was granted. P claimed
that Indiana does not allow such an order and appealed. The court of appeals affirmed the
Rule 35 order for a physical examination. It was submitted for review to the Supreme Court.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment