PULSIFER V. COMMISSIONER
    
      64 T.C. 245 (1975)
    
      NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over Irish Sweepstakes winnings for minors for 
      monies deposited with an Irish court. Pulsifer (Ps) sought review of a tax deficiency. 
    
      FACTS: Pulsifers are two brothers and one sister (P) and all are minor children. Mr. 
      Pulsifer, their father, acquired an Irish Sweepstakes ticket in his name and the names if 
      his children. They got a telegram that their ticket would be represented by Saratoga Skiddy 
      who would run in the Lincolnshire Handicap. Saratoga placed second and won $48,000. When Mr. 
      Pulsifer applied for the winnings but he was told that 3/4ths would not be released to him 
      because the ticket stub reflected three minor children. He was told that the monies withheld 
      would be placed with the court for the benefit of the children and released with interest 
      when they were 21 or until application was made on their behalf to the court. Mr. Pulsifer 
      filed for a request of the release of the funds. Both parties agree that the prize money is 
      income to P. There was a question as to what year it was to be included under. P contends 
      that neither constructive receipt nor the economic benefit doctrines apply and all that they 
      had in 1969 was a nonassignable chose in action. D argues that the economic benefit doctrine 
      applies and that the monies should be taxed in 1969. 
    
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get 
      free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples 
      of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment