STATE V. VEJVODA
438 N.W.2d 461 (1989)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was an appeal from a drunken driving conviction.
FACTS: Vejvoda (D) was convicted of drunk driving and received an enhanced sentence
because it was his second conviction. The testimony at trial was given by an Edwards a
police officer who observed D's car at 7th and Vine and then later approached D's car on
Oak. The officer never identified the city of county where he observed or apprehended D. D
was convicted and appealed contending the evidence was not sufficient to sustain his
conviction in that the state failed to prove that Hall County was the venue for his trial in
that the court improperly took judicial notice that the locations mentioned by the officer
were within Hall County.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment