BALDWIN V. G.A.F. SEELIG, INC.
294 U.S. 511 (1935)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the New York Milk Control Act.
FACTS: The New York Milk Control Act set up a system of minimum prices to be paid by
dealers to producers. To keep the system unimpaired by competition from afar, the Act had a
provision whereby the protective prices were extended to that part of the supply which comes
from other states. Seelig (P) purchased its milk from the Creamery in Vermont at prices
lower than the minimum payable to producers in New York. The Commissioner of Farms and
Markets refused to give P a license unless it signed an agreement that it would abide by the
New York statute and regulations in the sale of its imported product. P refused to do so. P
then sued to restrain the enforcement of the Act. The District Court of three judges granted
a final decree restraining enforcement of the Act while the milk was in cans but refused to
enjoin milk taken out of the cans for bottling. Both sides appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment