WASHINGTON V. SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1
458 U.S. 457 (1982)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Seattle (P) challenged a statewide initiative that terminated
mandatory busing under Equal Protection and the Fourteenth Amendment. Washington (D)
appealed a decision of the District Court which held the initiative unconstitutional which
was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.
FACTS: Because segregated housing patterns in Seattle have created racially imbalanced
schools, P historically has taken steps to alleviate the isolation of minority students;
since 1963, it has permitted students to transfer from their neighborhood schools to help
cure the District's racial imbalance. Eventually P enacted a resolution defining 'racial
imbalance' as 'the situation that exists when the combined minority student enrollment in a
school exceeds the district wide combined average by 20 percentage points, provided that the
single minority enrollment . . . of no school will exceed 50 percent of the student body.' P
implemented a 'magnet' program, designed to alleviate racial isolation by enhancing
educational offerings at certain schools, thereby encouraging voluntary student transfers. P
concluded that mandatory reassignment of students was necessary if racial isolation in its
schools was to be eliminated. P enacted the so-called 'Seattle Plan' for desegregation. The
plan makes extensive use of busing and mandatory reassignments, desegregates elementary
schools by 'pairing' and 'trading' predominantly minority with predominantly white
attendance areas, and by basing student assignments on attendance zones rather than on race.
The implementation was effective. The District Court found that the Seattle Plan 'has
substantially reduced the number of racially imbalanced schools in the district and has
substantially reduced the percentage of minority students in those schools which remain
racially imbalanced.' The counterrevolution was swift and immediate. A proposal, known as
Initiative 350, provided that 'no school board . . . shall directly or indirectly require
any student to attend a school other than the school which is geographically nearest or next
nearest the student's place of residence . . . and which offers the course of study pursued
by such student . . . .' Initiative 350 was placed on the Washington ballot for the November
1978 general election. The initiative was directed solely at desegregative busing in
general, and at the Seattle Plan in particular. Initiative 350 passed by a substantial
margin, drawing almost 66% of the vote statewide. P initiated this suit against the State
(D) in District Court challenging the constitutionality of Initiative 350 under the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court held the statute to be
unconstitutional, and the court of appeals affirmed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment