UNITED STATES V. HELSTOSKI
442 U.S. 477 (1979)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over Congressional immunity.
FACTS: Helstoski (D) was a member of the House of Representatives. D came under
investigation for corruption including the charge that aliens had paid D money to introduce
private bills which would suspend application of the immigration laws and allow them to stay
in the country. D appeared before the grand jury eight times and discussed the matters and
produced files. On the ninth appearance, D asserted the privilege of Speech or Debate
Clause. D was indicted for various criminal acts, The District court held that the Speech or
Debate Clause did not require dismissal but that the Government would not be allowed to
offer evidence of the actual performance of any legislative acts. The government filed an
appeal.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment