NEBBIA V. NEW YORK 291 U.S. 502 (1934) CASE BRIEF

NEBBIA V. NEW YORK
291 U.S. 502 (1934)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This is an appeal of lower courts' decision upholding a state statute.
FACTS: During 1932, the prices received by farmers for milk were much below the cost of production. A state legislative committee conducted an extensive study from which it determined essentially that low milk prices received by dairy producers created a risk of relaxed vigilance against contamination. In 1933 the state legislature established a Milk Control Board with power to 'fix minimum and maximum [retail] prices to be charged [by] stores to consumers for consumption off the premises where sold.' The Board fixed nine cents as the price to be charged by a store for a quart of milk. Nebbia (D), the proprietor of a grocery store in Rochester, was convicted based on selling milk for six and one-half cents per quart instead of the required nine cents. D was convicted and appealed and the convictions were affirmed by state courts. D asserted the statute and order contravene the equal protection clause and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The majority concedes that the dairy industry cannot be characterized as a public utility or a monopoly. The dissent points out that the legislative committee attributed decreased consumption notwithstanding low prices to consumers' reduced buying power; the dissent further states that higher store prices will not enlarge this power, nor will they decrease production.

ISSUE:


RULE OF LAW:


HOLDING AND DECISION:


LEGAL ANALYSIS:





Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online

for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.

https://bsmsphd.com




© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner

No comments:

Post a Comment