NEBBIA V. NEW YORK
291 U.S. 502 (1934)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This is an appeal of lower courts' decision upholding a state statute.
FACTS: During 1932, the prices received by farmers for milk were much below the cost of
production. A state legislative committee conducted an extensive study from which it
determined essentially that low milk prices received by dairy producers created a risk of
relaxed vigilance against contamination. In 1933 the state legislature established a Milk
Control Board with power to 'fix minimum and maximum [retail] prices to be charged [by]
stores to consumers for consumption off the premises where sold.' The Board fixed nine cents
as the price to be charged by a store for a quart of milk. Nebbia (D), the proprietor of a
grocery store in Rochester, was convicted based on selling milk for six and one-half cents
per quart instead of the required nine cents. D was convicted and appealed and the
convictions were affirmed by state courts. D asserted the statute and order contravene the
equal protection clause and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The majority
concedes that the dairy industry cannot be characterized as a public utility or a monopoly.
The dissent points out that the legislative committee attributed decreased consumption
notwithstanding low prices to consumers' reduced buying power; the dissent further states
that higher store prices will not enlarge this power, nor will they decrease production.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment