WEST LYNN CREAMERY V. HEALY
512 U.S. 186 (1994)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over state dairy subsidies and whether they
violate the Commerce Clause.
FACTS: The order at issue requires every 'dealer' in Massachusetts to make a monthly
'premium payment' into the 'Massachusetts Dairy Equalization Fund.' Each month the fund is
distributed to Massachusetts producers. Each Massachusetts producer receives a share of the
total fund equal to his proportionate contribution to the State's total production of raw
milk. Petitioners West Lynn and LeComte's (P) complied with the pricing order for two
months, paying almost $200,000 into the Massachusetts Dairy Equalization Fund. Ps then
refused to make the premium payments, and respondent commenced license revocation
proceedings. Ps then filed an action in state court seeking an injunction against
enforcement of the order on the ground that it violated the Commerce Clause. The state court
denied relief and respondent conditionally revoked their licenses. The Supreme Judicial
Court of Massachusetts affirmed, because it concluded that 'the pricing order does not
discriminate on its face, is evenhanded in its application, and only incidentally burdens
interstate commerce.' It conceded that '[c]ommon sense' indicated that the plan has an
'adverse impact on interstate commerce,' and that 'the fund distribution scheme does burden
out-of-State producers. The Court asserted that 'the burden is incidental, given the purpose
and design of the program.' The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment