FREEDMAN V. MARYLAND
380 U.S. 51 (1965)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the showing of the film 'Revenge at Daybreak.'
FACTS: Freedman (D) sought to show the film Revenge at Daybreak without first submitting the film to the State Board of Censors. Section 2 required such a submittal. Even though the film if submitted would have passed muster, D was still convicted of violating section 2 for not submitting the film in the first instance. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment