BISHOP V. EATON
161 Mass. 496, 37 N.E. 665 (1894)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a suit on a guaranty of debt. Eaton (D), guarantor, appealed
a judgment in favor of Biship (P), endorser, in P's action to recover on a guaranty contract.
FACTS: Eaton (D) wrote a letter to Bishop (P), that if D's brother Harry needed more
money that P should let him have it, and D will see that it is paid. A 200-dollar loan was
arranged with Stark for Harry and D was informed that P was acting as a surety. D claimed he
never received that letter. The note was in default and D assured P again that he would pay
it if his brother did not and that it would cost P nothing. P paid over the money to Stark
and D refused to pay P for his expenditures on the note and P sued. The trial court awarded
the judgment to P. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment