IN RE DAHL
278 N.W. 2d 316 (1979)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This case involves the courts discretion as to when a juvenile
offender should or should not be referred for prosecution as an adult. It is interesting
because it shows how legislatures can enact vague statutes that give little guidance and
wide discretion to judges.
FACTS: On April 8, 1978 the body of Rick Alan McGuire was found in a remote area. He was
shot in the head by a shotgun. A delinquency petition was filed against Dahl (D) for the
first degree murder of Ricky Alan McGuire. D admitted to the killing and was 17 at the time
of the murder. D's parents describe him as respectful and obedient. D had never been in
serious trouble with the law prior to this murder and D had maintained a B average in high
school while holding down a part time job and participating in athletics. He was a steady
and industrious worker. The trial court observed that the D was not a typical delinquent and
that he had no prior history that could have predicted this outcome. D was then referred for
adult prosecution because it was determined that the juvenile court could not successfully
treat D in the time remaining before its jurisdiction would expire. The other reason for the
referral was based on the serious nature of the crime and D's alleged threat to public
safety. D appeals the referral for adult prosecution.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment