HATLEY V STAFFORD
588 P.2d 603 (1978)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over a lease agreement. Stafford (D) lessors
appealed a verdict rendered in favor of Hatley (P) lessee in his action for trespass against
D.
FACTS: Hatley (P) leased land from Stafford (D) under a written lease that allowed
reentry by D in order to develop a mobile home park. P sued D for trespass for taking
possession of the property and cutting his immature wheat crop. D alleged that they had a
right to terminate the lease and offered to pay P the $70 per acre as stated in the
contract. P demanded $400 per acre and alleged that the written agreement was not the entire
integrated agreement of the parties and that they had orally agreed that the buyout
provision would apply only for a period of 30 to 60 days after signing the lease. The trial
court allowed this evidence and P got the verdict. D appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment