L. ALBERT & SON V. ARMSTRONG RUBBER CO.
178 F.2d 182 (2nd Cir. 1949)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the delivery of machines. Albert (P) appealed
a decision dismissing its complaint for recovery of the contract price for machines
delivered to Armstrong (D) and awarding P a recovery in quasi contract, and D appealed the
dismissal of its complaint for breach of contract.
FACTS: Albert (P) agreed to sell and deliver to Armstrong (D) four refiners that were
designed to recondition old rubber. The contract of sale was dated December, 1942. P
delivered two of the four machines in August, 1943. P delivered the other two on August 31
or September 8, 1945 and because of the delay in delivery of the other two, D refused to
accept all four in October, 1945. The court gave judgment to P for the value of the
equipment delivered. D appealed for the expenses it incurred in reliance upon P's promise.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment