STANDARD SUPPLY CO. V. RELIANCE INSURANCE CO.
272 S.E.2d 394 (1980)
NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a suit over the proceeds of a fire insurance policy.
FACTS: Standard (P) sued to recover the proceeds of a fire insurance policy written by
Reliance (D). The policy was written by Eaves (D1) and covered a dwelling house owned by P
in rural Chatham County. The policy had an exclusion clause in it that D would not be liable
for loss occurring while the building is vacant or unoccupied beyond a period of 60 days. P
showed at trial that since 1961 he had purchased fire and extended coverage insurance on the
dwelling through D1. Prior to 4 March 1976, D had written the coverage on the dwelling. In
March 1976, P procured a renewal with D. Prior to writing a renewal policy, D requested Tar
Heel to make a fire inspection. Tar Heel made the report and submitted it to D. The report
included a statement that the property was not vacant. The report did not otherwise specify
whether the dwelling was occupied or unoccupied. D furnished a summary to D1 and expressed
concern over repair problems and requested that D1 get the name of the tenant. D1 never
responded. At the time of inspection and renewal, the house had in fact been unoccupied
since January 1975. The house was destroyed by fire on July 5, 1976. D got the verdict and P
appealed.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment