VERTEX, INC. V. CITY OF WATERBURY
278 Conn. 557 (2006)
NATURE OF THE CASE: Vertex (P) appealed a judgment for City (D) on P's unjust enrichment
claim.
FACTS: P to perform specific services to prepare D's computer systems for the year 2000
problem. The parties entered into a written contract dated June 7, 1999, under which P would
install a certain software program on D's computers and perform the tasks outlined. Despite
the fact that the written contract was not executed until June 7, 1999, P commenced work in
March, 1999. On July 1, 1999, P submitted a proposal for additional work to remedy
additional year 2000 problems that it had identified during its first three months of work.
P alleges that D accepted its July, 1999 proposal, that it performed this additional work,
and that D refused to pay for it. D denies accepting and contends that the additional work P
claims to have performed was within the scope of the earlier written contract. D denies that
it owes P any additional money. P sued alleging (1) breach of contract; (2) estoppel; and
(3) unjust enrichment. The trial court dismissed, sua sponte, the first two counts and
allowed P to proceed to trial only on the unjust enrichment count. A jury tried the case and
D moved for a directed verdict. The unjust enrichment count was submitted to the jury, but
the trial court declared a mistrial when the jury was unable to reach a verdict. The case
was retried before a jury in June, 2004, with the same judge presiding. The case was limited
to the unjust enrichment count. The jury returned a general verdict in favor of D. This
appeal eventually followed. P claims that the trial court improperly instructed the jury
that it had to prove that there was an implied in fact contract to prevail on its claim for
unjust enrichment.
ISSUE:
RULE OF LAW:
HOLDING AND DECISION:
LEGAL ANALYSIS:
Get
free access to the entire content for Mac, PC or Online
for 2-3 days and free samples
of all kinds of products.
for 2-3 days and free samples of all kinds of products.
https://bsmsphd.com
© 2007-2016 Abn Study Partner
No comments:
Post a Comment